|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
Re London Wine (1975)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
The customers of a wine dealer purchased wine in an arrangement that called for the
wine to be put in trust for the customer pending delivery. When the company became
insolved, the question arose whether the wine that was `in trust' was identified with
sufficient certainty for there to be a valid trust.
It was held that there was not sufficient CertaintyOfSubjectMatter -- although the
number of bottles was certain, it was not clear which bottles were the subject of
the trust. Unlike cases such as HunterVMoss1993, which concerned intangibles, wine
bottles are theoretically distinguishable from one another. In a way this seems an
odd decision; after all, the customers did not buy particular bottles of wine, they
bought a certain number of bottles, to be taken from the supplier's general stock.
However, to allow a trust of uncertain tangible objects to succeed would lead the
courts into making decisions about whether different types of tanglible objects
were distinguishable or not.
CaseLaw
TrustLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|